Can we define pharmaceutical companies as mere multinationals?
Their only objective is profit. Make money.
Take the example of Glaxo.
Over 30 billion euros per year.
Both nationally and nationally, this extreme round of money has now become a business. It is not wrong to think that there is agreement to have common results in certain studies. This is confirmed, among other things, in Italy and elsewhere.
Our own Bioethics Committee discusses one of the problems of profit, conflict of interest:
A more or less indefinite number of researches is clearly influenced by industry. With distorted results
Then we go to demand the peer review…
This is not just a problem on a national basis.
Marcia Angell, Editor in Chief NEJM
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine
Richard Norton, Editor in Chief The Lancet
The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.
Does billing so much turn your head?
What would be the first and only interest of health care professionals?
Obviously,that of bribe doctors.
3 BILLION DOLLARS . For fraud Inviting physicians to prescribe off-label medications. Have corrupted doctors. That is the medicine we want.
Again with regard to medicines used in the wrong way
It’s not over.
Still GSK. The desire to save people never stops?
In simple terms, makeup the results of a trial to be able to commercialize the vaccine on Papilloma Virus
Let’s remember that about 90% of infections regress spontaneously without evolving into cancer. But of course they really cared about the health of consumers.
Here instead, we have an internal report, also by Glaxo, which lists the different side effects of their vaccines produced. Most of them are not reported on the datasheet.
PS: in the USA, doctor must be asked to have the datasheet in the pharmacy at the same time as the purchase of the vaccine.
And how can we not end up with the Glaxo, accompanied by Novartis?
Do you remember swine flu?
In 2009, the WHO came to declare an SEI pandemic grade, the highest. In fact, it obliges governments to equip themselves with the vaccine. That was already ready.
Distributed by these two companies.
In Italy, Novartis took care of it
Agreement in which the State was clearly penalized.
Absolute confidentiality of information
Penalty to be paid by the State if the vaccine had not been authorised for sale
Possible compensation from citizens all paid by the State.
In Italy, out of more than 10 million vaccines, less than 1 million have been sold.
Conflict of interest? The altar came out in 2013. 
Millions of Euro literally donated to Novartis and Glaxo, with the clear complicity of the WHO.
Thank you Glaxo, for showing how health is the most important thing to safeguard in our lives. Since childhood, from the second month of life.
GSK is a global pharmaceutical company committed to researching and developing innovative medicines and vaccines, self-medication products and products for personal well-being, and making them available to the maximum number of people who can benefit from them.